home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0803>
- <title>
- Mar. 27, 1989: A Setback For Pro-Life Forces
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Mar. 27, 1989 Is Anything Safe?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- HEALTH, Page 82
- A Setback for Pro-Life Forces
- </hdr><body>
- <p>New studies find abortions pose little danger to women
- </p>
- <p> For years, pro-life forces have charged that abortions
- threaten serious health consequences for women. First of all,
- they argued, abortion is a dangerous surgical procedure that can
- lead to subsequent miscarriages, infertility or even death. More
- recently, they claimed to have discovered a form of delayed
- stress, similar to that experienced by some Viet Nam vets, that
- can result in severe depression years after an abortion. Last
- week both claims were undercut by the release of a report on the
- effects of abortion by Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and by
- the conclusions of a panel of the American Psychological
- Association.
- </p>
- <p> The draft report was prepared by Koop in 1987 at the
- request of President Ronald Reagan to examine the physical and
- psychological dangers of abortion. In January, the avidly
- pro-life Koop announced that he could not issue the report
- because the scientific data were flawed and inconclusive.
- Subpoenaed by a House subcommittee that oversees some health
- budgets, the Surgeon General's report concluded that "abortion
- imposes a relatively low physical risk" for women. Acknowledging
- his strong "pro-life bias," Koop testified that any
- public-health problem associated with abortion is "minimal."
- </p>
- <p> On the question of the emotional repercussions of an
- abortion, Koop was more circumspect. Although pro-life advocates
- say the condition created by abortions can cause serious
- psychological problems as long as ten years afterward, the
- Surgeon General explained that in reviewing more than 250
- studies, he had found "major methodological flaws" and could not
- draw any definite conclusions about the so-called post-abortion
- syndrome. "There is no doubt that some people have severe
- psychological effects after abortion," Koop said, "but anecdotes
- do not make good scientific material."
- </p>
- <p> Nancy Adler, a member of a special American Psychological
- Association panel on abortion, told legislators that after a
- review of the same data, the group had concluded that abortion
- inflicts no particular psychological damage on women. She
- pointed out that despite the millions of women who have
- undergone the procedure since the landmark Roe v. Wade case
- legalized abortion in 1973, there has been no accompanying rise
- in mental illness. "If severe reactions were common," she noted,
- "there would be an epidemic of women seeking treatment."
- </p>
- <p> Last week's hearings came at an important time for both
- sides in the abortion fight. Next month the Supreme Court will
- hear the first serious challenge to Roe v. Wade since it became
- law. The original decision was based in part on the court's
- conviction that legal abortion is a safe option. Since then,
- pro-life forces have chipped away at the decision's medical
- premises. "These are extremely important conclusions," said
- Democratic Congressman Ted Weiss of New York, who organized the
- hearings. Conceded Koop: "It's very difficult to separate
- abortion the moral issue from abortion the public-health issue."
- </p>
- <p> All sides at the hearing, however, could agree on one
- thing: the best solution to the abortion dilemma is to prevent
- unwanted pregnancies. "Most abortions would not take place,"
- noted the Surgeon General, "if pregnancies were not unplanned
- and unwanted." He and others called for better research into
- contraception and improved sex education as important steps
- toward reducing the need for abortions.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-